Trending...
- Register Now For The 2025 Boston Neighborhood Basketball League Season - 343
- Mother's Day Wake-Up Call for Maternal Health: New Initiative Demands Better Postpartum Support
- Boston: Traffic Advisory for May 9, 2025
Will Nevada's Highest Court Confront Corruption—Or Allow It to Continue?
LAS VEGAS - BostonChron -- Source: The Verity Project
Karina Singer, a pro se appellant and daughter of the late Steven J. Singer, is awaiting a critical ruling from the Nevada Supreme Court after filing extensive, unrebutted evidence of fiduciary misconduct, elder financial abuse, and judicial irregularities in her father's trust and estate case.
The appeal—Case No. 89171—was originally retained by the Supreme Court for over eight months before being suddenly transferred to the Nevada Court of Appeals just days after Singer formally requested summary disposition, citing NRAP 31(d), and presenting direct evidence of court record tampering, elder exploitation, and constitutional due process violations.
Despite following every procedural rule available to self-represented litigants—including the Court's own Informal Brief Form, which lacks a section for a routing statement—the transfer was carried out without addressing any of the pending dispositive motions or the substantial evidence submitted into the record, some of which includes:
Singer has since filed an Emergency Motion to Recall Transfer and Retain Jurisdiction, along with a Supplement and Renewed Request for Summary Disposition or Evidentiary Hearing, refuting every baseless argument in the Respondents' opposition. All motions are currently before a panel of three Supreme Court Justices, Patricia Lee, Linda Bell, and Douglas Herndon.
More on Boston Chron
"The law is not in question. The facts are not in dispute," said Singer. "If the Nevada Supreme Court fails to apply the law and address the uncontested evidence already in the record, it exposes both the Court and the State of Nevada to federal intervention, civil rights litigation, and a potential RICO action for coordinated misconduct involving trustees, attorneys, and judicial officers. This is no longer just about my father; it's about a systemic breakdown that cannot be ignored."
The Court has everything it needs to act. The real question is: Will the Nevada Supreme Court stand for truth and justice under controlling law and binding precedent; or sacrifice its legitimacy, trigger federal scrutiny, and lose the trust of the people it was created to protect?
Singer's filings argue that the transfer violated the Nevada Rules of Appellate Procedure and, if not reversed, would leave constitutional violations unaddressed and incentivize further abuse within Nevada's probate and guardianship courts. She asserts that the Supreme Court has a mandatory, non-waivable obligation under NRAP 17(a)(9)–(11) to retain jurisdiction over appeals involving judicial misconduct, systemic due process failures, issues of first impression, and matters of statewide public concern. Singer requests that the Court recall the transfer, retain jurisdiction, and summarily rule in her favor under NRAP 31(d), citing the complete absence of an answering brief and any disputed facts in the record. She further urges the Court to grant en banc review, hold responsible parties accountable, and issue a published decision that restores public trust by acknowledging and correcting the serious legal errors committed in the lower court.
More on Boston Chron
As Nevada watches, the decision in The Matter of Steven J. Singer Trust & Estate - Singer v. Boekankamp could set a precedent for how the state's highest court handles self-represented litigants, judicial accountability, and the integrity of trust and estate proceedings.
Karina Singer, a pro se appellant and daughter of the late Steven J. Singer, is awaiting a critical ruling from the Nevada Supreme Court after filing extensive, unrebutted evidence of fiduciary misconduct, elder financial abuse, and judicial irregularities in her father's trust and estate case.
The appeal—Case No. 89171—was originally retained by the Supreme Court for over eight months before being suddenly transferred to the Nevada Court of Appeals just days after Singer formally requested summary disposition, citing NRAP 31(d), and presenting direct evidence of court record tampering, elder exploitation, and constitutional due process violations.
Despite following every procedural rule available to self-represented litigants—including the Court's own Informal Brief Form, which lacks a section for a routing statement—the transfer was carried out without addressing any of the pending dispositive motions or the substantial evidence submitted into the record, some of which includes:
- Forged financial account documents and unopposed motions for trustee removal, accounting, criminal fraud, and elder abuse.
- Allegations of perjury and false police reports by opposing parties,
- Tampering with electronic court service systems and docket manipulation,
- Improper distribution of over $1 million in trust assets in direct violation of the trust's provisions.
Singer has since filed an Emergency Motion to Recall Transfer and Retain Jurisdiction, along with a Supplement and Renewed Request for Summary Disposition or Evidentiary Hearing, refuting every baseless argument in the Respondents' opposition. All motions are currently before a panel of three Supreme Court Justices, Patricia Lee, Linda Bell, and Douglas Herndon.
More on Boston Chron
- Boston: May 16 Traffic Advisory
- Boston: Mayor Wu Announces Expansion of Free Swim Lessons for Youth; Recognizes International Water Safety Day on May 15
- Fzata to Attend BIO International Convention 2025
- Boston: Traffic Advisory for May 14 - 24, 2025
- $1B Target by 2027 Amid eSIM, Global Roaming Expansion; $57.6M Q1 Revenue and Market Uplisting, Advancing Toward IQSTEL, Inc. (Stock Symbol: IQST)
"The law is not in question. The facts are not in dispute," said Singer. "If the Nevada Supreme Court fails to apply the law and address the uncontested evidence already in the record, it exposes both the Court and the State of Nevada to federal intervention, civil rights litigation, and a potential RICO action for coordinated misconduct involving trustees, attorneys, and judicial officers. This is no longer just about my father; it's about a systemic breakdown that cannot be ignored."
The Court has everything it needs to act. The real question is: Will the Nevada Supreme Court stand for truth and justice under controlling law and binding precedent; or sacrifice its legitimacy, trigger federal scrutiny, and lose the trust of the people it was created to protect?
Singer's filings argue that the transfer violated the Nevada Rules of Appellate Procedure and, if not reversed, would leave constitutional violations unaddressed and incentivize further abuse within Nevada's probate and guardianship courts. She asserts that the Supreme Court has a mandatory, non-waivable obligation under NRAP 17(a)(9)–(11) to retain jurisdiction over appeals involving judicial misconduct, systemic due process failures, issues of first impression, and matters of statewide public concern. Singer requests that the Court recall the transfer, retain jurisdiction, and summarily rule in her favor under NRAP 31(d), citing the complete absence of an answering brief and any disputed facts in the record. She further urges the Court to grant en banc review, hold responsible parties accountable, and issue a published decision that restores public trust by acknowledging and correcting the serious legal errors committed in the lower court.
More on Boston Chron
- Boston: Planning Department Advances Two New Office-To-Residential Conversion Projects
- LIB TH-50/TH-80 Benchtop Environmental Chamber Drives Global Demand
- Marc Soucy's Newest Music Series Approaches Its One Year Mark
- Fairmint Releases Whitepaper for Open Captable Protocol (OCP) to Advance On-Chain Equity Securities
- Award-winning NJ Author Celebrates New Release and Multi-Author Collaboration
As Nevada watches, the decision in The Matter of Steven J. Singer Trust & Estate - Singer v. Boekankamp could set a precedent for how the state's highest court handles self-represented litigants, judicial accountability, and the integrity of trust and estate proceedings.
Source: The Verity Project
0 Comments
Latest on Boston Chron
- Boston: New Pathways For Direct Entry For Madison Park Graduates Into Union Apprenticeship Programs
- WWSG Announces Exclusive Speaking Partnership with Patrick McGee, Author of 'Apple in China'
- Multi-Billion Dollar Drone Cleaning Market Addressed via New UAE Office, AI Drone and Quantum Computing Solutions in Varied Industries ZenaTech, Inc
- Boston: Improving Parking and Curb Usage Through Tech Innovation
- Timken to Participate in the KeyBanc Industrials & Basic Materials Conference
- Spac Recovery Co. Files $590 Million Lawsuit Against Blackstone Products, Nomura , Franklin Square, Oaktree et al
- Grand Opening Business Funding Assist- Online Service
- NBA Champion Lamar Odom Launches Anti-Addiction Meme Coin, Sparking Disruptive Innovation in Web3
- HD Physical Therapy Wakefield Celebrates 13 Years
- Register Now For The 2025 Boston Neighborhood Basketball League Season
- Plan Signed to Purchase Kadima Neuropsychiatry Institute as Clinical Treatment Model and Leading Investigative Site Addressing Suicidal Depression
- Tribeca Film Festival Official Podcast Selection Lead Features Hollywood Stars, Focuses On Ending Childhood Lead Poisoning In New York!
- Industrial Parts Fittings Champions the Revival of American Manufacturing
- Boston: City Partners with Three Community-based Organizations to Provide Accurate, Culturally Relevant Translations
- Labthink invites you to a Webinar
- $34 Billion Market in 2025 Advancing to $45 Billion in 2026 for Phase III Development of New Blood Thinner, Less Problematic Than Warfrain: $CVKD
- Pikmykid Launches $100,000 School Safety Grant Giveaway to Support K–12 Schools Across the U.S
- Slotozilla Data Report: Unveiling 2024's Gaming Statistics
- BK Flooring Releases Their Top Reasons to Upgrade Kitchen Tile Flooring in 2025
- The OpenSSL Corporation and the OpenSSL Foundation Certify Results of Technical Advisory Committee Elections